One single stealthy unmanned aerial vehicle may easily sneak into the battlespace alone to do its mission and get out without being detected. But what if you have many and their wake turbulence is detected as the move thru the air. Or what if all their heat signatures, which are small add up to a larger one and it is seen by infrared detection? What if all the different angles bouncing off each other causes an anomaly or disruption in other waves, such a cell tower frequency plumes, satellite radio or other such situations?
I propose a double solution to penetrating enemy airspace undetected with a series of massive UAV unmanned aerial vehicle swarms. Additionally I propose that these autonomous aircraft have with them payloads to deliver, communication to disrupt and amongst them a large number of single mission UAVs. That is to say units we do not want back which are merely robotic kamikaze units to kill the enemy, where the entire aircraft including the frame is made of explosive material of the highest grade.
Is it evil to suggest such things? Absolutely not, you see when the politicians fail to reach a compromise with mischievous nation state dictators who sponsor international terrorism and such a political impasse leads to war and your enemy then threatens to strike using international terrorism events or to blow your allies off the map; well then it is not evil to suggest a strategy capable of total annihilation of said enemy. And I think Carl von Clauswitz would back me up on this as well.
By using the slipstream of a larger stealthier aircraft the UAV swarms can stack them selves and fly in tight formation even locking them selves together if needed to remain perfectly in place, creating the least amount of additional anomaly of heat, airflow disruption, radar reflection or sound. We need to develop anti-radar formation swarm strategies for fast moving unmanned aircraft, as the modern battlespace is changing and we must stay on the bleeding edge. It is the difference between winning and losing a battle. Consider all this in 2006.
“Lance Winslow” – Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; http://www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs/
After five wins from six races and with a seemingly unassailable lead in the championship it is hard to imagine either side considering about other options. Ross Brawn admitted last year that he was still assessing Button, after being quite impressed by him during the 2004 patronage when he and Michael Schumacher raced against him in the BAR Honda. There has been quite a bit of chatter in the last couple of days about Jenson Buttons future, in light of inputs made by Brawn GPs Nick Fry on the subject.
Jensons been with us a long time, and weve had failures and weve had successes, said Fry. My objective, and our objective, is to have him for the rest of his career, and nothings changed on that front. Its mutual that he would like to stay with the team, and after five race wins, we should be able to get something together.
Although F1 online is a cynical business, it matters all round that Button stayed with the team through the winter even when it meant he was potentially risking his career. As this season goes on Brawn is increasingly impressed with Buttons ability to pull out a lap time in qualifying and to control races.
The team have rewarded that loyalty with a race winning car and no driver can ask more than that.
